A paper adds a little more to the wording

Experts from British and Australian universities decid to debunk the myth that people have accumulat more scientific information about the Moon than about the oceans. They believe that this formulation is outdat and cite historical and scientific facts as evidence. Where did the wording come from? For in a scientific article in . In it, oceanographer and chemist George Deacon refers to the statement of geophysicist ward Bullard, who suggest that science knows more about the moon than about the ocean. “Deep oceans cover more than two-thirds of the Earth, and yet more is known about the landscape of the Moon than about the shape of the ocean floor.

The first time this thesis was voic

At the time of the publication of the article on the Cambodia Phone Number List topography of the seab, scientists really knew little. For example, the first ever crew descent into the deepest part of the ocean (the Mariana Trench) took place three years later, in . Scientists have been exploring the seab for over years In , sonar (devices that measure the distance of the surface by detecting sounds emanating from it) were not yet install on ships. Their use help in to compile a complete map of the ocean surface bas on acoustic data. Over the next years, . % of the seafloor was plott in high resolution large scale is almost million km.

Phone Number List

It is a diverse and dynamic ecosystem

Which is about three times the total surface USA CFO area of ??the Moon. Moreover, according to scientists, the wording that the Moon is better explor is generally not very correct. The ocean must be consider in three dimensions – in addition to the seab, it is important to study flora and fauna, because unlike the Moon,  Another myth that has develop in the modern world suggests that more people have visit the Moon than in the deepest place on Earth. Scientists believe that this hypothesis is difficult to prove.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *