Argu that such materials were unstable and could not exist, which found experimental confirmation for many decades after. But in 2004, Andrey Geim and Konstantin Novoselov were able to obtain the same two-dimensional material – graphene. in 2010 for this discovery. It is beneficial for society to have a system in which every or almost every young scientist has the opportunity to conduct research that is of interest to him personally. Develop your idea, which may not be confirm in the existing paradigm. Because, firstly, interest in the problem is the best motivation to continue to persistently look for a solution.
They were award the Nobel Prize
Even when it doesn’t work the first time. Secondly, scientists go Wuhan Mobile Phone Number List through the entire path of research – from hypothesis to implementation. And they become more competent in solving “unsolvable” problems. Third, by running this on a large number of scientists, we as a society can receive a small but still share of research that has the potential to change existing science. that will turn into technological or product solutions. Something for the time being will remain a fun study. And this is not due to the fact that they were doing some kind of stupidity, but we just do not know now where it can come in handy. I immiately remember the Ig Nobel Prize.
There will be a little more research
This is a great example because it raises the USA CFO question: how to really understand what is important and what is not? Any research can be valuable. Who would have thought that understanding what attracts female malaria mosquitoes more , will allow the development of special traps that will be in great demand in Africa. Or, my favorite example, squashing insects on the windshield. In 1997, when this study was done, it seem funny. But it became very popular when they began to create unmann vehicles. Who is involv in such financing in our country.