The cognitive system may suggest that he is entitl to more fish than he was given. Another “set of rules” – altruism – says that it is necessary to take care of relatives, even if they do not reciprocate. And the fact that the collector was just unlucky activates the cognitive system that is responsible for risk distribution. In this case, the gatherer will come to the conclusion that he deserves help from fellow fishermen. The system of moral compromise has the ability to weigh conflicting moral obligations and make an intuitive decision. The obligation to help a brother is in conflict with the obligation not to harm a neighbor.
The system of moral compromises is divid
His system of moral compromises must find a balance Benin Phone Number List between these obligations and find the most correct solution. For example, he decides to steal three fish out of ten – an optimal solution that will ruce (but not minimize) his brother’s recovery time and at the same time will not cause significant damage to his neighbors. for the decision. At the same time, it is possible that there may be a temptation to take more fish in order to eat more yourself. How does the moral compromise system work? When we think about a problem, one or more social cognitive systems are activat.
The Gatherer is fac with a dilemma
Each system reads the situation in its own way, draws USA CFO conclusions and creates a morally charg view of the situation. If different perceptions contradict each other, a system of moral compromises is activat. into three subsystems: MV (English moral values ??- “moral values”) combines moral values; FS (eng. feasible set – “feasible set”) builds a set of solutions that is available for this dilemma; MAX (eng. maximizes the rightness function – “maximizes the function of correctness”) generates the optimal solution, given the existing restrictions. All these subsystems operate unconsciously.