We seek consolation from like-mind people and level the viability of the “wrong ones from the Internet” by labeling them with derogatory labels. At this moment, a dangerous transformation takes place, the opponent becomes a real enemy, against which any means are us. Peculiarities The system of moral compromises has certain features. Let’s take the hunter-gatherer dilemma as an example. The system produces the to compromise. The hunter-gatherer fish all day. The catch is meager: this is not enough to fe the children and the sick brother. At this time, the neighbors are smoking fish. The collector asks to share.
Whole range of judgments from radical
They give him fish, but much less than he ask for. Yes stealing is Belgium Phone Number List wrong. But neglecting the fact that his brother is sick is also not good. What decision can he make? Do not steal anything, steal some part of the fish or all the fish. all of these options. Judgments depend on incentives. Incentives determine and what we can do. Our collector will think about how much each stolen fish will spe up the brother’s recovery and how much it will harm his neighbors. For example, he may decide that he can steal all the neighbor’s fish if it saves his brother’s life. If the brother has a cold, and the extra food will bring the brother closer to recovery by just one day, then he is likely to give up the idea of stealing.
The moral compromise system provides
An if the fish will significantly help the brother to USA CFO overcome the disease and at the same time cause not so much damage to the neighbors, then the collector will prefer to steal only part of the fish. A moral dilemma activates a system that is responsible for a particular value (honor, justice, mutual assistance, and others). Value, in turn, suggests a solution. Reciprocity has to do with the cognitive system of social exchange. Let’s say a collector remembers that last week he was very helpful to his neighbor, and she responds with stinginess.